Key point

If people are viewing your property but nobody is making an offer, ask your agent for evidence rather than a quick price cut: where each enquiry came from, what the visitor expected before arriving, which objections recur, what competing property they preferred and what follow-up happened. Then decide whether the main problem is the advert, a mismatch between advert and reality, the viewing experience, uncertainty about the property or the price. Address the problem the evidence points to and set a date to review the result.

First locate the point where the sale is getting stuck

A viewing is not the same as purchase intent. Some visitors are still learning the market, some discover that the location or layout does not fit, and some may like the home but consider another option better value. The useful question is not simply why nobody offered. It is what changed between the promise of the advert and the decision after the visit.

Separate the journey into enquiries, booked viewings, completed viewings, second visits and written offers. Ask for the actual record for your property and the dates covered. A large audience that does not book suggests a different problem from qualified visitors who attend, ask detailed questions and then choose another home.

  • Few enquiries: review visibility, photographs, headline, price bracket and basic facts
  • Enquiries but few booked visits: check response time, availability and qualification
  • Visits but no second step: compare expectations with the property seen in person
  • Serious interest but no offer: identify unresolved price, condition, document or timing concerns

Ask for a short report, not a reassuring summary

Agree a simple format with the estate agency: date, source of the enquiry, whether the visit took place, relevant feedback, follow-up and next action. Buyer identities and private details are not needed. Patterns are more useful than a vague statement such as ‘they liked it but are still thinking’. Ask the agent to distinguish what the visitor actually said from the agent's interpretation.

Also ask what happened after the visit. Was a specific question answered? Were documents or a floor plan sent? Was the visitor invited to return or to put forward conditions in writing? Feedback without a follow-up action is only half a report.

  • What did the visitor expect from the advert before arriving?
  • Which feature ruled the property in or out?
  • Was the objection about price, condition, layout, location, documents or timing?
  • Which alternative did the visitor consider stronger, and on what basis?
  • What follow-up was agreed and when was it completed?

Treat repeated objections differently from isolated comments

One person's dislike of a colour, view or staircase is not a market verdict. When different visitors independently raise the same issue, it becomes a signal worth testing. Ask the agent to group feedback without turning every comment into a reason to renovate or reduce the price.

Some objections cannot be changed. A third floor without a lift, limited parking or a busy road should be described accurately and reflected in targeting and price. Other gaps are easier to correct: dark photographs, missing room measurements, an unclear floor plan, clutter during visits or inconsistent information across portals.

Check whether the advert and the viewing tell the same story

Compare the main photograph, description, floor area, room count, condition and surroundings with what a visitor encounters. If the advert attracts people looking for a different type of home, more viewings will not necessarily produce better offers. Clearer information can reduce unsuitable visits while improving the quality of the next enquiries.

Portuguese mediation law requires an agency to use accuracy and clarity when presenting the property's characteristics, price and payment conditions so that recipients are not misled. It also requires communication of a fact that may jeopardise the intended transaction. This does not create a standard viewing-report format, so reporting frequency and responsibilities should be agreed with the agency in writing.

Decide whether price is the issue without guessing

Ask the agent to place the property beside the alternatives that visitors can buy now and, where reliable evidence is available, relevant completed transactions. Keep asking prices separate from completed prices. Then adjust for differences a buyer can see: exact location, usable space, light, lift, parking, outdoor area, condition, energy performance and documentation.

A price change is easier to justify when several suitable visitors reach the same value objection and the competing evidence supports it. If visitors instead mention missing information, poor access to viewings or a misleading advert, reducing the price before fixing those points may not test the real problem.

Conditional example, not a market benchmark: if several visitors say the home is well presented but choose a similarly located property with a lift and parking at a comparable total price, ask the agent to quantify those differences before proposing a new asking range. The conclusion depends on local evidence, not on a universal discount.

Agree one action plan and a review date

Ask the agent to recommend no more than a few prioritised changes, who is responsible for each task and when the result will be reviewed. Possible actions include correcting the advert, replacing the first photographs, adding missing measurements, changing viewing availability, answering a recurring document question or revisiting the price range.

Record the starting point before the change, then compare like with like. If the advert, price, photographs and targeting all change at once, you may get a result but learn little about what caused it. A written review also gives you a fairer basis for assessing the agency's work than the raw number of viewings.

What this means with IMOJA Online Sale

IMOJA Online Sale costs €499 including VAT for one property and runs for 90 days from the first publication. The owner supplies the photographs and hosts the viewings; IMOJA prepares and publishes the listing, handles enquiries and relays offers within the agreed scope. The service fee remains payable if the property does not sell.

Because the owner conducts the viewings, agree how observations will be recorded and passed back after each appointment. That division of work can suit an owner with time to host viewings, but it is not the same as a full-service agency hosting visits. Neither service model guarantees an offer, a sale date or a Google position.

Questions to send your agent today

Ask for written answers covering a defined period and your property only. The purpose is to choose the next action, not to produce a long report for its own sake.

  • How many enquiries, booked visits, completed visits, repeat visits and offers were recorded?
  • Which feedback is a direct visitor comment and which part is your interpretation?
  • Which objection has appeared more than once?
  • Which competing properties are visitors choosing and why?
  • What follow-up happened after each serious visit?
  • What single change do you recommend first, on what evidence and when will we review it?

Official sources

Rules and data can change. Check the latest version of each source and how it applies to your property and transaction.

Want a clearer next step for your property?

Tell us where the property is advertised, what visitors have said and what has already changed. IMOJA will review the situation and explain the relevant service and price before you decide.

Review my selling options ↗︎

Analyse my listing with AI

Related articles

Selling · Practical advicePlenty of views, no buyer: why your home in Portugal isn't sellingSelling · PriceHow to set the asking price for property in PortugalSelling · ViewingsHow to host a property viewing: a practical guide for sellersSelling · Estate agentsHow to compare estate-agent proposals when the commission is different